FGJCDMX prosecutes two police officers for abuse of authority

According to the Mexico City Attorney General’s office, after allegedly arresting a man with false charges, a judge connected two CDMX preventive police officers to the process in separate hearings.fgjcdmx,

This, due to allegations of abuse of authority and abusive exercise of functions, for which he also imposed precautionary measures informal pre-trial detentionThe second hearing was resumed later this Friday, ending after an extension of the constitutional period requested by the defense.

And that according to the CDMX Prosecutor’s Office investigation, both elements of the Civil Defense Secretariat’s preventive police (SSC) would have falsely taken into custody the person they accused of stealing the charger charge gun One of the two elements, the production of the accused before the Ministry of Public Affairs, which concluded that the facts were not so.

Similarly, the FGJCDMX highlighted that the controlling judge granted time until 6 July to close the supplementary investigation against the two police officers, when it would be decided whether they were innocent or not.

Meanwhile, both the elements of SSC will remain within North Men’s Preventive PrisonFrom where they will continue to act against him, he is subject to preventive detention after the charges against him.

case against one of the relatives

On the other hand, FGJCDMX also announced a temporary suspension against an agent public ministry For the irregularities that led to the release of people belonging to an investigation folder in March for crimes against health and a cover-up for the reception.

In this regard he clarified that, as per the investigation of the Internal Affairs Unit (UAI), the public servant did not challenge the defense’s request to grant the conditional suspension of the process as he should have done as a social representative, which resulted in the release of the accused.

we recommend you to read

While the agent was removed from his duties for the duration of the UAI investigation, it was determined that the “potentially attributable irregularities in his actions” were intentional.